The Paradox in Galatians 2:2 – The Method by Which a “Reasonable” Paul Was Manufactured
In the first article, I dismantled the idea that Paul went to Jerusalem to verify his Gospel. Now I will go further: I will show …
Peter Disappears from the Book of Acts – How the Leader of the Disciples Was “Removed” from Luke
If the Book of Acts were simply an objective continuation of the history begun in the Gospels, one would expect Peter to remain one of …
Luke – Paul’s Scribe and Assistant. Without Luke, Paul would never have been accepted.
If Paul is the theologian, Luke is the official chronicler of the new religion.He writes two foundational volumes: the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles.Together, …
The Gospel “by Revelation” – The Essential Contradiction & Unresolved Questions
Almost everything Paul claims about his own authority is tied to a single event: the moment in which he says that he “received the Gospel …
Why Is Paul the Only One in Conflict with the Jews? – What the Accusations in Jerusalem Hide
One of the most significant paradoxes in the history of the first Christian century is the fact that only Paul is accused in Jerusalem of “defiling the …
Why Does Luke Ignore Arabia? – Real History or Advocacy?
In Galatians 1:17, Paul states clearly:“I went into Arabia, and later I returned to Damascus.” It is a key detail, part of his argument that …
Luke’s Acts and Paul – How the Book of Acts Supports Paul’s Strategy Without Stating It Openly
In the previous articles, I showed that Paul did not go to Jerusalem to seek validation, but to obtain a decision that would allow him to continue …